diff --git a/content/theses/metaphysica/on free will/_index.md b/content/theses/metaphysica/on free will/_index.md
index a6ec5d9..626778e 100644
--- a/content/theses/metaphysica/on free will/_index.md	
+++ b/content/theses/metaphysica/on free will/_index.md	
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ title: "on free will"
 
 # on free will
 
-## task
+## introduction
 In this part, I attempt to present and prove free will as a mode of action. Multiple times throughout long discussions with others, and myself, I have run into issues pertaining to the definition and the idea that such a mode even exists. 
 
 Moreover, to be able to move ahead with discussing moral, societal, and human issues, I need to define free will, since, in every other mode of action, the aforementioned cannot exist; one needs to be able to *choose* in order to have a moral status, form relationships, and even define themselves.
diff --git a/content/theses/metaphysica/on logic/_index.md b/content/theses/metaphysica/on logic/_index.md
index 8aff126..58656cd 100644
--- a/content/theses/metaphysica/on logic/_index.md	
+++ b/content/theses/metaphysica/on logic/_index.md	
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ title: "on logic"
 
 # on logic
 
-## task
+## introduction
 In this part, I attempt to deconstruct logic; with one singular purpose, to prove that logic is not self consistent, and therefore fails the necessary condition set by logic itself for a mode of thinking to be useful. This is done since, if logic itself is paradoxically true and false at the same time, it probably does not exist.
 
 This is beneficial, because with the existence of logic one is extremely limited to the ideas that they can discuss; truthfully one can only speak of mathematical concepts given that logic is the only way to approach reality.