20 lines
1 KiB
Markdown
20 lines
1 KiB
Markdown
|
---
|
||
|
|
title: "on logic"
|
||
|
|
weight: 1
|
||
|
|
bookCollapseSection: true
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# on logic
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## introduction
|
||
|
|
in this part, i attempt to deconstruct logic; with one singular purpose, to prove that logic is not self consistent, and therefore fails the necessary condition set by logic itself for a mode of thinking to be useful. this is done since, if logic itself is paradoxically true and false at the same time, it probably does not exist.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
this is beneficial, because with the existence of logic one is extremely limited to the ideas that they can discuss; truthfully one can only speak of mathematical concepts given that logic is the only way to approach reality.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
to show that we can talk about the unobservable and infallible, i create a weak and a strong claim of axiomatic reliance. the weak claim deals with the nature of axioms as a matter of faith, whilst the strong claim deals with the axiomatic reality of all knowledge.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## table of contents
|
||
|
|
1. [the nature of faith](/metaphysika/on%20logic/axioms)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
2. [concerning fallacies](/metaphysika/on%20logic/fallacies)
|